Home / Car reviews / Kia Stinger vs Jaguar XE vs Alfa Romeo Giulia

Kia Stinger vs Jaguar XE vs Alfa Romeo Giulia

Petrol energy is creation a quip in a large way. Until recently a executive tavern marketplace was dominated by fit diesel cars, nonetheless not all buyers are after a motorway mile-muncher, and improving tech means improved economy from petrol.

Some motorists are instead looking for a indication that has room for a family and is gentle adequate to invert in any day, nonetheless is also fun to drive. That’s where these petrol-powered cars come in, headed adult by a latest Kia Stinger.

Best executive cars 2018

The Korean brand’s distinguished new indication fares good in diesel form, nonetheless how will this 2.0-litre T-GDi chronicle mount adult to dual of a best-handling saloons on sale?

First adult is a Jaguar XE, a stylish and flexible indication that’s been tighten to a tip of a category for years. Then there’s a Alfa Romeo Giulia. This automobile scores on character in spades and is warning on a highway due to a lightweight construction. It matches a XE for energy in 2.0 Turbo 200 form – nonetheless both of these some-more determined cars route a new Kia’s 244bhp output.

Which petrol-powered indication is a best choice for penetrating drivers with bland requirements, then? Read on to find out.

Kia Stinger

Kia Stinger - front

Kia’s Stinger has tender in manly V6 petrol form in a prior test, nonetheless here we’ll find out if this 244bhp 2.0-litre chronicle has what it takes to kick dual clever rivals. We’re contrast a GT-Line S model, that costs £35,525.

Although a Kia is a heaviest automobile of a three, a energy advantage meant it put in a clever opening in a tests. It sprinted from 0-60mph in 6.9 seconds, that placed it forward of a XE, nonetheless not a Giulia.

Kia Stinger GT-Line 2.0 petrol review

In less-than-perfect conditions a Jag took 8.2 seconds, with a Alfa clocking 6.7 seconds. The Stinger has a many energy and a many torque as well, so total with a eight-speed gearbox there’s decent in-gear flexibility.

Kia Stinger - rear

It took 11.0 seconds to go from 50-70mph in tip (eighth), that was 2.4 seconds faster than a XE and 1.3 seconds adult on a Giulia.

However, a delivery could be better. It’s not as discerning to change as a Alfa’s box and in a reduce gears you’ll notice that any ratio thumps into place. As a result, it’s lacking a bit when we adult a gait and loses some motorist appeal.

Still, a gearbox is well-spoken underneath normal use, while a Kia is sanctified with a honeyed framework that will greatfully penetrating drivers. In fact, it’s during a core of this car’s appeal. The Stinger has a good change of comfort and fun, roving uniformly for a many part, nonetheless though sacrificing physique control and agility.

Kia Stinger - interior

There’s a tiny hurl as we spin in, nonetheless it’s good tranquil and doesn’t detract too many from a pulling experience. The steering is good weighted, nonetheless a shelve isn’t as discerning as possibly rival’s (especially a ultra-fast Alfa’s), so it isn’t utterly as warning on turn-in.

The reduce kerbweight of a rivals means that a Kia can’t compare possibly for ultimate motorist appeal, nonetheless on a prolonged motorway run a Stinger’s well-spoken float is welcome. It’s also polished if you’re not pulling a engine too hard. Move on to some nation roads and there’s some fun to be had in a newcomer, nonetheless we’d rather be in a Jaguar or Alfa Romeo there.

Testers’ notes: “The Kia’s rise energy of 244bhp is constructed aloft in a rev operation than a rivals, during 6,200rpm. That’s right during a red line, nonetheless gutsy torque means we don’t need to rev it for ultimate performance.”

Jaguar XE

Jaguar XE - front

The Jaguar XE is a stream benchmark for a sporty bland tavern car, and here we’re contrast a 2.0-litre petrol indication in R-Sport trim. It costs £34,565 as tested, slotting in between a rivals here. The doubt is, can a sporty Jag take victory?

With a comparatively light 2.0-litre petrol engine mounted in a nose, a XE’s front finish is flexible and penetrating to change direction, while a pithy steering is accurate and inspires confidence. The speed is good and matches a rate of response from a framework – a Alfa’s shelve might be a hold too quick, for instance – and there’s a decent turn of grip.

Jaguar XE R Sport review

As with a Kia, it rolls a tiny in corners, nonetheless a agreeable framework set-up means that on an normal British road, a XE rides uniformly as well. However, during a lane a Jag couldn’t compare a opening of a rivals. Although churned conditions on a day meant a tavern trailed a Kia and

Alfa from 0-60mph, a involuntary gearbox didn’t conflict fast off a line, and a software’s programming shifts adult early in first. This meant it was slower, nonetheless traction was good enough.

Jaguar XE - rear

In rigging a necessity was reduced, nonetheless a XE still couldn’t compare a rivals for pace. It was slower than a Alfa and Kia between 50 and 70mph in sixth, seventh and eighth gears.

Once a automobile is rolling a engine revs sweetly, nonetheless with reduction torque during 320Nm it feels a tiny some-more strained than a Alfa’s somewhat torquier section (330Nm) and a punchier engine in a Kia (353Nm). It’s well-spoken and refined, though, and a sincerely loose gearbox suits a reduction mad approach. It means a XE scores as a driver’s car, nonetheless also as a cruiser. Its motorway manners are as good as you’d design from a Jaguar saloon.

Testers’ notes: “The Jaguar’s petrol engine produces a limit of 320Nm of torque from as low as 1,200rpm. There’s copiousness of low-down punch, that boosts a XE’s refinement.”

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia - front

Alfa Romeo saloons have always done some-more clarity with petrol power, and this £31,580 Giulia 2.0 Turbo 200 Super aims to once again yank during your heart strings. But this time a Italian indication backs it adult with considerable pulling dynamics, copiousness of usability and decent economy, even in petrol form.

The sporty pulling position is a spirit of what’s to come, since a framework is a sharpest here, with super-fast steering and pointy stifle response. At initial a Giulia can feel shaken and hyper-alert since a steering is really sensitive, even for a sporty saloon.

Long-term test: Alfa Romeo Giulia

However, once we get used to a rate of response we learn to use reduction close and a Alfa Romeo’s reactions feel some-more natural. The engine matches a chassis’ perceptiveness to perform and revs sweetly, also creation a best sound of a exam trio, that adds to a motorist appeal.

Alfa Romeo Giulia - rear

It was a quickest automobile on test, accelerating from 0-60mph in 6.7 seconds. Its lightweight construction meant a Giulia was also fastest over a in-gear assessments, pulling strongly from low down interjection to that multiple of decent torque and a reduce kerbweight.

The gearbox itself isn’t a smoothest-shifting unit, though; it loses out to a Jag, nonetheless it’s improved than a Kia’s somewhat lumpy set-up. In primer it jerks a poignant changes through, while in automobile it slurs shifts better, nonetheless doesn’t have a pointing we’d like.

For a many partial a Alfa deals with bumps and imperfections good with a adaptive dampers in their softer mode, that we can entrance simply regulating a switch on a centre console. Some surfaces and potholes do send a shockwave by a framework that a Jaguar would understanding with better, nonetheless a Giulia is gentle adequate on a whole.

Alfa Romeo Giulia - interior

Still, it’s clearly set adult for sportier dynamics and it’s a driver’s choice of a 3 models here. Dynamics are also helped by a limited-slip differential on a car, relating a Kia.

Testers’ notes: “The Alfa’s offset framework and ultra-fast steering meant it handles really well, nonetheless it also has a best engine of a 3 cars on test. It’s smooth, sounds good and revs sweetly.”

Verdict

First place: Jaguar XE

Jaguar XE - front

The XE wins this exam by a slim margin. It’s not as good to expostulate as a Alfa, nonetheless it’s somewhat some-more gentle and returned improved economy on test. Also, Jag’s financial deals meant it’s a best-value choice for buyers on PCP, and there’s lots of customary kit. It’s a empathize a XE trails a bit on performance, nonetheless a engine is smooth, polished and delivers adequate energy to secure another win.

Second place: Alfa Romeo Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia - front

Sharp handling, clever opening and a good pulling position meant a Giulia is a tip collect here for penetrating drivers. It’s also pretty careful and will be a good business choice. Unfortunately, it’s let down by a bad infotainment complement and some costly discretionary extras you’ll need to supplement to compare a rivals. But for many buyers it will interest some-more than a XE.

Third place: Kia Stinger

Kia Stinger - front

There’s still a proceed to go before this petrol Stinger can contest with a rivals here. The engine is punchy, nonetheless a gearbox binds it back. The flexible handling, good infotainment complement and decent excellence make a Kia a contender and good value a second look. Yet a unsatisfactory economy and high PCP prices (despite a additional kit) meant it comes third – despite by a tiny margin.

Is it value watchful for this model?

Mercedes C 200 Sport

Mercedes C-Class - front

Due: Now
Price: £34,830 
Engine: 1.5-litre 4cyl, 181bhp

We were tender with a updated C-Class on a initial expostulate final week, nonetheless we’ve nonetheless to highway exam it in a UK. Its mild-hybrid-assisted engine is a bit down on energy subsequent to rivals, nonetheless it’s expected to be some-more economical.

Figures

Check Also

New Audi TT S 2018 review

Near adequate 20 years ago to a day, Audi launched a strange TT during a …

Home / Car reviews / Kia Stinger vs Jaguar XE vs Alfa Romeo Giulia

Kia Stinger vs Jaguar XE vs Alfa Romeo Giulia

Petrol energy is creation a quip in a large way. Until recently a executive tavern marketplace was dominated by fit diesel cars, nonetheless not all buyers are after a motorway mile-muncher, and improving tech means improved economy from petrol.

Some motorists are instead looking for a indication that has room for a family and is gentle adequate to invert in any day, nonetheless is also fun to drive. That’s where these petrol-powered cars come in, headed adult by a latest Kia Stinger.

Best executive cars 2018

The Korean brand’s distinguished new indication fares good in diesel form, nonetheless how will this 2.0-litre T-GDi chronicle mount adult to dual of a best-handling saloons on sale?

First adult is a Jaguar XE, a stylish and flexible indication that’s been tighten to a tip of a category for years. Then there’s a Alfa Romeo Giulia. This automobile scores on character in spades and is warning on a highway due to a lightweight construction. It matches a XE for energy in 2.0 Turbo 200 form – nonetheless both of these some-more determined cars route a new Kia’s 244bhp output.

Which petrol-powered indication is a best choice for penetrating drivers with bland requirements, then? Read on to find out.

Kia Stinger

Kia Stinger - front

Kia’s Stinger has tender in manly V6 petrol form in a prior test, nonetheless here we’ll find out if this 244bhp 2.0-litre chronicle has what it takes to kick dual clever rivals. We’re contrast a GT-Line S model, that costs £35,525.

Although a Kia is a heaviest automobile of a three, a energy advantage meant it put in a clever opening in a tests. It sprinted from 0-60mph in 6.9 seconds, that placed it forward of a XE, nonetheless not a Giulia.

Kia Stinger GT-Line 2.0 petrol review

In less-than-perfect conditions a Jag took 8.2 seconds, with a Alfa clocking 6.7 seconds. The Stinger has a many energy and a many torque as well, so total with a eight-speed gearbox there’s decent in-gear flexibility.

Kia Stinger - rear

It took 11.0 seconds to go from 50-70mph in tip (eighth), that was 2.4 seconds faster than a XE and 1.3 seconds adult on a Giulia.

However, a delivery could be better. It’s not as discerning to change as a Alfa’s box and in a reduce gears you’ll notice that any ratio thumps into place. As a result, it’s lacking a bit when we adult a gait and loses some motorist appeal.

Still, a gearbox is well-spoken underneath normal use, while a Kia is sanctified with a honeyed framework that will greatfully penetrating drivers. In fact, it’s during a core of this car’s appeal. The Stinger has a good change of comfort and fun, roving uniformly for a many part, nonetheless though sacrificing physique control and agility.

Kia Stinger - interior

There’s a tiny hurl as we spin in, nonetheless it’s good tranquil and doesn’t detract too many from a pulling experience. The steering is good weighted, nonetheless a shelve isn’t as discerning as possibly rival’s (especially a ultra-fast Alfa’s), so it isn’t utterly as warning on turn-in.

The reduce kerbweight of a rivals means that a Kia can’t compare possibly for ultimate motorist appeal, nonetheless on a prolonged motorway run a Stinger’s well-spoken float is welcome. It’s also polished if you’re not pulling a engine too hard. Move on to some nation roads and there’s some fun to be had in a newcomer, nonetheless we’d rather be in a Jaguar or Alfa Romeo there.

Testers’ notes: “The Kia’s rise energy of 244bhp is constructed aloft in a rev operation than a rivals, during 6,200rpm. That’s right during a red line, nonetheless gutsy torque means we don’t need to rev it for ultimate performance.”

Jaguar XE

Jaguar XE - front

The Jaguar XE is a stream benchmark for a sporty bland tavern car, and here we’re contrast a 2.0-litre petrol indication in R-Sport trim. It costs £34,565 as tested, slotting in between a rivals here. The doubt is, can a sporty Jag take victory?

With a comparatively light 2.0-litre petrol engine mounted in a nose, a XE’s front finish is flexible and penetrating to change direction, while a pithy steering is accurate and inspires confidence. The speed is good and matches a rate of response from a framework – a Alfa’s shelve might be a hold too quick, for instance – and there’s a decent turn of grip.

Jaguar XE R Sport review

As with a Kia, it rolls a tiny in corners, nonetheless a agreeable framework set-up means that on an normal British road, a XE rides uniformly as well. However, during a lane a Jag couldn’t compare a opening of a rivals. Although churned conditions on a day meant a tavern trailed a Kia and

Alfa from 0-60mph, a involuntary gearbox didn’t conflict fast off a line, and a software’s programming shifts adult early in first. This meant it was slower, nonetheless traction was good enough.

Jaguar XE - rear

In rigging a necessity was reduced, nonetheless a XE still couldn’t compare a rivals for pace. It was slower than a Alfa and Kia between 50 and 70mph in sixth, seventh and eighth gears.

Once a automobile is rolling a engine revs sweetly, nonetheless with reduction torque during 320Nm it feels a tiny some-more strained than a Alfa’s somewhat torquier section (330Nm) and a punchier engine in a Kia (353Nm). It’s well-spoken and refined, though, and a sincerely loose gearbox suits a reduction mad approach. It means a XE scores as a driver’s car, nonetheless also as a cruiser. Its motorway manners are as good as you’d design from a Jaguar saloon.

Testers’ notes: “The Jaguar’s petrol engine produces a limit of 320Nm of torque from as low as 1,200rpm. There’s copiousness of low-down punch, that boosts a XE’s refinement.”

Alfa Romeo Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia - front

Alfa Romeo saloons have always done some-more clarity with petrol power, and this £31,580 Giulia 2.0 Turbo 200 Super aims to once again yank during your heart strings. But this time a Italian indication backs it adult with considerable pulling dynamics, copiousness of usability and decent economy, even in petrol form.

The sporty pulling position is a spirit of what’s to come, since a framework is a sharpest here, with super-fast steering and pointy stifle response. At initial a Giulia can feel shaken and hyper-alert since a steering is really sensitive, even for a sporty saloon.

Long-term test: Alfa Romeo Giulia

However, once we get used to a rate of response we learn to use reduction close and a Alfa Romeo’s reactions feel some-more natural. The engine matches a chassis’ perceptiveness to perform and revs sweetly, also creation a best sound of a exam trio, that adds to a motorist appeal.

Alfa Romeo Giulia - rear

It was a quickest automobile on test, accelerating from 0-60mph in 6.7 seconds. Its lightweight construction meant a Giulia was also fastest over a in-gear assessments, pulling strongly from low down interjection to that multiple of decent torque and a reduce kerbweight.

The gearbox itself isn’t a smoothest-shifting unit, though; it loses out to a Jag, nonetheless it’s improved than a Kia’s somewhat lumpy set-up. In primer it jerks a poignant changes through, while in automobile it slurs shifts better, nonetheless doesn’t have a pointing we’d like.

For a many partial a Alfa deals with bumps and imperfections good with a adaptive dampers in their softer mode, that we can entrance simply regulating a switch on a centre console. Some surfaces and potholes do send a shockwave by a framework that a Jaguar would understanding with better, nonetheless a Giulia is gentle adequate on a whole.

Alfa Romeo Giulia - interior

Still, it’s clearly set adult for sportier dynamics and it’s a driver’s choice of a 3 models here. Dynamics are also helped by a limited-slip differential on a car, relating a Kia.

Testers’ notes: “The Alfa’s offset framework and ultra-fast steering meant it handles really well, nonetheless it also has a best engine of a 3 cars on test. It’s smooth, sounds good and revs sweetly.”

Verdict

First place: Jaguar XE

Jaguar XE - front

The XE wins this exam by a slim margin. It’s not as good to expostulate as a Alfa, nonetheless it’s somewhat some-more gentle and returned improved economy on test. Also, Jag’s financial deals meant it’s a best-value choice for buyers on PCP, and there’s lots of customary kit. It’s a empathize a XE trails a bit on performance, nonetheless a engine is smooth, polished and delivers adequate energy to secure another win.

Second place: Alfa Romeo Giulia

Alfa Romeo Giulia - front

Sharp handling, clever opening and a good pulling position meant a Giulia is a tip collect here for penetrating drivers. It’s also pretty careful and will be a good business choice. Unfortunately, it’s let down by a bad infotainment complement and some costly discretionary extras you’ll need to supplement to compare a rivals. But for many buyers it will interest some-more than a XE.

Third place: Kia Stinger

Kia Stinger - front

There’s still a proceed to go before this petrol Stinger can contest with a rivals here. The engine is punchy, nonetheless a gearbox binds it back. The flexible handling, good infotainment complement and decent excellence make a Kia a contender and good value a second look. Yet a unsatisfactory economy and high PCP prices (despite a additional kit) meant it comes third – despite by a tiny margin.

Is it value watchful for this model?

Mercedes C 200 Sport

Mercedes C-Class - front

Due: Now
Price: £34,830 
Engine: 1.5-litre 4cyl, 181bhp

We were tender with a updated C-Class on a initial expostulate final week, nonetheless we’ve nonetheless to highway exam it in a UK. Its mild-hybrid-assisted engine is a bit down on energy subsequent to rivals, nonetheless it’s expected to be some-more economical.

Figures

Check Also

New Audi TT S 2018 review

Near adequate 20 years ago to a day, Audi launched a strange TT during a …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *