Home / Car reviews / Hyundai i30 Fastback vs Mazda 3 Fastback

Hyundai i30 Fastback vs Mazda 3 Fastback

It’s not too mostly these days that we see a tiny tavern automobile on a road, since hatchbacks and SUVs browbeat a sales charts, along with larger, some-more costly executive models.

In fact, if you’re after a automobile of this form there are unequivocally usually dual options: a new Hyundai i30 Fastback (which is indeed a five-door) and Mazda’s 3 Fastback, during slightest until a Honda Civic four-door arrives after in a year.

• Best family cars to buy

It’s satisfactory to contend that a i30 and 3 Fastbacks are niche choices and that a unchanging cars improved support for UK buyers’ tastes. But some people will cite what these models offer.

Still, there’s no doubt that these dual cars parasite many of a same boxes on a intensity selling list, so that is a improved pick?


Hyundai i30 Fastback

Hyundai i30 Fastback - front

For: More enchanting pattern than unchanging hatchback version, good infotainment system, comfortable
Against: Not many fun to drive, some-more costly than a hatch

Having determined itself as a mainstream brand, Hyundai took a large step by designing, building and contrast a new i30 in Europe, for European buyers. That includes a Fastback version, even if it’s not utterly as renouned as a unchanging hatchback sibling.

The stream i30 operation hints during Hyundai’s mainstream sales ambitions with a ease look, and it’s a identical story inside, where a i30 clearly takes cues from a likes of a Volkswagen Golf. It doesn’t utterly lift that off, though, and while peculiarity is good, a pattern is plain; a Mazda’s interior is some-more interesting.

• New Hyundai i30 Fastback 2018 review

This regressive feel continues underneath a skin, since a i30 Fastback is still and ease on a move. At idle a thrum from a 1.0-litre three-cylinder engine is noisier than a well-spoken 2.0-litre four-cylinder in a Mazda, yet once we get above 30mph a Hyundai is mostly on customary with a opposition in terms of refinement.

Hyundai i30 Fastback - rear

With 118bhp and 171Nm of torque, a section serves adult decent performance, and nonetheless a automobile was a small slower than a Mazda from 0-60mph during a track, in a in-gear tests that improved paint real-world use it had a edge.

From 50-70mph in sixth it was over 4 and a half seconds faster than a 3, that helps out a lot on a motorway; you’ll need to say transformation some-more delicately in a Mazda, or change down to accelerate.

The Hyundai was faster in all of a in-gear assessments, yet it did route a opposition by scarcely a second covering 30-70mph by a gears.

What’s some-more critical with these models is float quality, though, and while a i30 deals good with severe roads adult to a point, a cessation starts to onslaught on disproportionate surfaces and there’s a some-more conspicuous volume of physique transformation than in a opposition here. The i30 Fastback is a gentle motorway cruiser, however.

Hyundai i30 Fastback - interior

Despite float comfort being somewhat worse than a Mazda’s, a i30 is also utterly lifeless to drive. There’s copiousness of grip, yet a lifeless steering takes divided from your delight as a motorist and physique hurl in corners is some-more forward than in a Mazda.

The six-speed gearbox and thrummy three-cylinder engine go some approach to adding a bit of motorist appeal, yet it can’t compare a sweet-handling Mazda 3 Fastback here. It’s many some-more matched to a loose pushing style, yet a opposition can accommodate that usually as well, while also being some-more fun and engaging.

Testers’ notes:

  • Design: Dashboard pattern in Hyundai is organic and useful, yet there’s small visible interest
  • Connectivity: You get Apple CarPlay and Android Auto as customary on a i30, and a arrangement works really good with a smartphone-based systems
  • Materials: Quality is good, yet finishes aren’t as pleasing as Mazda’s. Build peculiarity trails as well

Mazda 3 Fastback

Mazda 3 Fastback - front

For: Great pushing experience, poetic primer gearchange, gentle ride
Against: Dated infotainment system, slower in-gear opening than rival

The Mazda 3 Fastback is formed on a unchanging 3, yet with a rear-end redesign it’s a loyal saloon. As a result, a foot is deeper and it offers some-more space than in a customary hatch.

However, it does impact practicality a small in other ways since for many people a induce version’s easier entrance will be preferable – and even a i30 Fastback uses a hatchback foot to urge entrance to a bucket bay.

• Mazda 3 in-depth review

Mazda offers a singular operation of 3 Fastbacks, with usually dual trim levels and one engine: this 118bhp 2.0-litre petrol. The good news is that a engine is a prominence of a pushing experience.

Mazda 3 Fastback - rear

With no turbocharger, a naturally aspirated section is well-spoken and really gratifying to use. You’ll need to keep on tip of your gearchanges in sequence to stay in a energy band, yet that’s no hardship since a primer gearbox in a 3 Fastback is one of a best in any car, with a delightful, accurate and mechanical-feeling shift.

In a in-gear tests a Mazda fell behind slightly, since it doesn’t have a same low-down torque as a turbo engine in a i30. It took a Mazda 11.4 seconds to cover 50-70mph in fifth, while a i30 was a whole second faster, recording a time of 10.4 seconds. The 3 was also slower in third and fourth from 30-50mph.

While a petrol engines in both cars broach small some-more than adequate performance, their interest is some-more focused on their refinement.

The Mazda is a smoother of a two, and in sold is some-more inside during motorway speeds. It will also interest some-more for penetrating drivers notwithstanding a opening deficit, since it’s some-more fun to rev.

Mazda 3 Fastback - interior

Ride comfort is another rarely critical cause for these dual models, and a Mazda has a corner over a i30 here. It rides uniformly over bumps and potholes, both during speed and around town. There’s not a lot in it – both cars are some-more than gentle adequate – yet a Mazda’s improved damping puts it forward here.

It’s also significantly some-more stoical in corners than a rival, and is honestly fun to drive. The well-weighted controls, offset framework and gratifying powertrain meant a 3 is enchanting during all speeds in flattering many all environments. The Mazda’s good pushing position is also a compare for a experience.

Another cause that sets a 3 detached here is a high-quality interior. It doesn’t demeanour utterly as complicated as many hatchback rivals’, yet subsequent to a Hyundai a Mazda’s dashboard is done of some-more upmarket materials and feels really solid.

Testers’ notes:

  • • Infotainment: Central touchscreen offers nav, and could be sharper, yet it’s easy adequate to use and also responds fast to inputs around centre console dial
  • • Dashboard: High-quality materials that are pleasing to hold meant Mazda feels some-more upmarket
  • • Seats: Driving position in a 3 is superb, charity considerable comfort, support and visibility


First place: Mazda 3 Fastback

Mazda 3 Fastback - front

The 3 Fastback isn’t as convincing as a induce version, nor many family models, yet it’s a best choice in this category of dual (for now). It’s improved to drive, some-more comfortable, cheaper and has a improved interior than a Hyundai, so it takes a win in this conduct to head.

Second place: Hyundai i30 Fastback

Hyundai i30 Fastback - front

The i30 Fastback has no vital flaws, yet a lifeless pushing knowledge and cabin stop it winning here. While it’s a bit roomier than a 3, this isn’t adequate to take a victory; a somewhat restive float means that even yet there’s some-more space, passengers won’t be as comfortable.

Check Also

BMW X2 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

Sporty crossovers are about a many renouned zone of a marketplace right now. Every manufacturer …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *