Home / Car reviews / Audi Q5 vs Jaguar F-Pace

Audi Q5 vs Jaguar F-Pace

Audi’s Q5 is a excellent reward SUV, yet until now we haven’t tested it in 3.0 V6 TDI form, with a operation singular to only 2.0 TDI turbodiesel and 2.0 TFSI petrol versions.

While many models in this category are still sole with a smaller, cheaper and some-more fit 2.0-litre diesel, a incomparable V6 creates copiousness of clarity in already polished cars like a Q5. It serves adult easy, free cruising ability and adds fibre to a package. There competence be a financial chastisement to compensate on a squeeze cost and regulating costs, yet these cars still supplement adult with bigger diesels underneath their bonnets.

• Best 4x4s and SUVs on sale

The Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d Portfolio has proven this for a few years now, and is a stream favourite reward SUV with a large diesel. So, does a Audi’s incomparable engine corner it forward of a Jaguar? Let’s find out. 


Audi Q5

For: Engine feels muscular, cabin peculiarity and tech, well-spoken and tranquil ride.
Against: Performance not utterly as considerable as F-Pace’s, trails a Jag on bucket space slightly. 

When Audi launched a all-new second-generation Q5 behind in 2017, a 3.0-litre V6 TDI was always in a product plan. But a organisation pronounced this engine would follow during a after date. That time has now come, and it’s been value a wait, since this larger, smoother TDI enhances a Q5’s healthy characteristics even further.

At a forefront of that is refinement. The V6 pulls smoothly, and it’s bending adult to an eight-speed involuntary and Audi’s quattro four-wheel-drive complement as standard. It produces 282bhp and 620Nm of torque for free performance.

This outlay is some approach down on a Jaguar’s, yet a Q5 is 74kg lighter, that offsets a F-Pace’s additional oomph. This meant it was quicker from 0-60mph during a exam track, holding 6.2 seconds to a Jag’s 6.9-second effort.

In-gear opening is some-more to do with torque, and while a lighter Q5 still matched a F-Pace between 30 and 50mph in third and fourth, a some-more torque-rich Jag had a corner between 50 and 70mph in fifth rigging and above – by a sizeable 2.7-second domain in eighth.

The Audi offers aloft float comfort, though, since a Q5 was propitious with a £2,000 adaptive atmosphere suspension. That’s a dear option, yet a Q5’s cost advantage gives we headroom to excavate into a extras. Besides, with a complement fitted, in Comfort mode it floats serenely over all yet a harshest, many ripped tarmac. Riding on 20-inch alloys (a £900 extra), it feels agreeable yet controlled, and exhibits scarcely as many lively as a sporty F-Pace.

The steering doesn’t broach any feel, yet a set-up is direct, nonetheless exploiting this and being assertive with your inputs causes a automobile to roll. You could always switch a dampers to Dynamic mode, yet a Q5 feels harsher here, with that forgiving float reduced, as with physique lean.

Sportier S line trim has a slick, sumptuously embellished cabin, with good build peculiarity and expensive-feeling materials that accelerate a atmosphere of sophistication. It’s helped by a good list of kit: LED lights, half-leather, half-Alcantara electric sports seats and a sportier bodykit feature, and so do sat-nav, journey and meridian control, front and behind parking sensors, DAB radio, Bluetooth, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto.

On tip of that, a automobile had a £1,395 Technology Pack, that adds a 12.3-inch Virtual Cockpit arrangement and a incomparable 8.3-inch shade on tip of a dash. You also get wireless charging and 3 years’ connected services. 

Testers’ notes

  • Display: Larger 8.3-inch shade on tip of a lurch is partial of a exam model’s £1,395 Tech Pack, and it’s tranquil by a MMI rotary dial.
  • • Transmission: Eight-speed automobile box shifts uniformly and transfers energy to quattro four-wheel drive.
  • • Quality: From leather seats to steel and plastics on dash, materials used have a high-grade feel.

Jaguar F-Pace

For: Surprisingly flexible handling, polished engine, clever space and practicality that don’t impact styling.
Against: Lacklustre infotainment system, interior peculiarity no compare for a Audi’s, pricier than Q5. 

The F-Pace noted new domain for Jaguar. It was a brand’s initial SUV, and nonetheless it was entering a rival zone full of rivals that had been honed over a series of generations, a British organisation got a recipe right initial time; a F-Pace went true to a tip of a class.

Under a skin a automobile uses many of a aluminium expertise Jag gained by a growth of a stream XE and XF saloons. Yet notwithstanding regulating some of this lightweight element in a construction, a F-Pace is utterly a bit heavier than a Audi, during 1,954kg.

You do feel this on a move, yet a framework set-up does a best to negate a bulk, since a steering has only a right turn of pointing for a automobile of this type, and there’s adequate hold to behind adult how fast a Jag reacts to your inputs.

It feels some-more energetic than a Q5, interjection in partial to a four-wheel-drive system. In Dynamic mode especially, we can feel a F-Pace shuffling torque to a spindle that needs it most, boosting lively and traction.

There’s copiousness of torque, too – 700Nm from a 3.0-litre turbodiesel V6 – and some-more energy than in a Audi, during 296bhp. However, as we’ve seen, that additional weight meant a Jaguar couldn’t compare a Audi off a line, even if it only had a corner in gear.

Another area where it trails a Audi is float quality. Our F-Pace featured Jag’s £1,185 Adaptive Dynamics Pack, that has a complement that constantly adjusts a adaptive dampers within a parameters dynamic by a pushing mode you’ve comparison (these embody Normal and Dynamic, and settings for inauspicious weather).

In a default comfort environment a Jaguar rides sweetly on 19-inch alloys, yet it still doesn’t have a plusher, some-more fluid-feeling cessation control of a Audi. You notice this over bigger bumps in particular.

It’s still easily refined, though. Helped by a smooth-shifting eight-speed involuntary box and purring engine, that never feels stretched, whisking a automobile along involves clearly as small bid as it does in a Audi.

It’s a contrition that a interior peculiarity can’t compare a turn of excellence a Jag serves up. Despite a aloft price, a F-Pace’s materials don’t feel as costly or as pleasing as those in a Q5, with some ungainly ergonomics not assisting things.

Testers’ notes 

  • • Infotainment: Jaguar’s 10-inch Touch Pro complement isn’t a many manageable touchscreen, and doesn’t offer a functionality of a Audi’s set-up. 
  • Gearbox: F-Pace also has a sharp eight-speed auto, and it adds to a car’s exquisite refinement.
  • • Steering: You don’t design SUVs to offer many steering feel, yet F-Pace delivers reasonable feedback.


First place: Audi Q5

While smaller diesel Q5s make some-more financial sense, this 3.0 TDI is beautifully built. Air cessation ensures it rides well, and it’s cheaper to buy and run than a Jag. It’s not as practical, yet is distant from cramped, and is a higher-quality, some-more solid, some-more advanced-feeling vehicle. 

Second place: Jaguar F-Pace

The F-Pace is still a shining SUV that’s quick, well-spoken and polished in 30d AWD Portfolio form. But nonetheless it’s some-more unsentimental than a Q5, it trails on peculiarity and isn’t as comfortable. It’s also some-more pricey, and during this turn a sub-standard infotainment means it has to give best.

Check Also

BMW X2 vs Volkswagen T-Roc

Sporty crossovers are about a many renouned zone of a marketplace right now. Every manufacturer …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *